|
      
 
  
|

|
1)
Article
1: A Few Words About the Kano Model
2) Article
2: Explaining the Total Degrees of Freedom for Six Sigma Practitioners
By: E. George Woodley
|
|
A Few Words About the Kano Model
By: E. George Woodley
A very astute student of Dr.
Ishikawa, Dr. Noriaki Kano, developed an interesting model to address the
various ways in which Six Sigma practitioners can prioritize customer needs.
This became particularly important when trying to rank the customer's wants
and desires in a logical fashion.
The first step is to identify the quality
characteristics that are typically fuzzy, vague and nebulous. These are
referred to as the voice of the customer (VOC). Once
the voice of the customer is understood, we can attempt to translate it into
quantitative terms known as critical to quality (CTQ)
characteristics. This should not be a new concept for those familiar with
the Six Sigma methodology. What happens from here, though, can sometimes go
astray if we are not careful, and try to put our own spin on the needs of
the customer. This may be the result of trying to make things more easily
obtainable for us - a formula for failure.
So, now that we have identified what is important to
the customer in workable terms, we can attempt to go to the second step.
Always keeping the customer in mind, we can apply the concepts outlined in
the Kano Model.
|
|
 |
The model is
broken down into an (x,y) graph, where the x-axis represents how good we are
at achieving the customer's outcome(s), or CTQ's. The y-axis records
the customer's level of satisfaction the customer should have, as a result
of our level of achievement.
The dashed line
represents the Must Be's. That is, whatever the quality
characteristic is, it must be present, such that if it is not, the customer
will go elsewhere! The customer does not care if the product is wrapped in
24-carat gold, only that it is present
and is functionally doing what it was designed to do. An example of this
would be a client who checks into a hotel |
room expecting to find a bed,
curtains, and bathroom in the room. These items are not called out for by
the customer, but would definitely cause them to go elsewhere if any of
these "characteristics" were not present.
The solid line represents the
Performance. This line reflects the voice of the customer.
The better we are at meeting these needs, the happier the customer is. It is
here where the trade-offs take place. Someone wanting good gas mileage would
not likely expect to have a vehicle that has great accelerations from a
standing position.
By far, the most interesting
evaluation point of the model is the Delighter (dashed and dotted
line). This represents those qualities that the customer was not expecting,
but received as a bonus. A few years ago, it was customary that when a car
was taken back to the dealer for a warranty oil change, the vehicle was
returned to the owner with its body washed, mirrors polished, carpets
vacuumed, etc. After a few trips to the dealer, this Delighter became
a Must Be characteristic. Thus, a characteristic that once was
exciting was now a basic need, and a part of the customer's expectations.
Another example of this is the amenities platter that some hotels provide
their platinum customers upon checking in. I am one of those clients
entitled to such a treat. This practice was certainly a delight. It has,
however, become an expected part of my check-in, such that if there is no
platter waiting in my room, I'm on the phone with the front desk.
Once the critical to quality
characteristics have been prioritized, the last step involves an analysis of
evaluating or assessing just how well we can satisfy each of Dr. Noriaki
Kano's classifications.
The Practical Side to the Kano Model
Recapping - The Kano Model is a tool
that can be used to prioritize the Critical to Quality
characteristics, as defined by the Voice of the Customer and
the three categories identified by the model are:
Must Be: Whatever the
quality characteristic is, it must be present, such that if it is not, the
customer will go elsewhere!
Performance: The better we
are at meeting these needs, the happier the customer is.
Delighter: Those qualities
that the customer was not expecting, but received as a bonus.
Being a trainer and consultant, I spend a lot of
time on the road. In doing so, I have a tendency to check into hotels on a
regular basis. I once queried the manager of a hotel I spend a lot of time
at how he established practices to entice the business client. He related
the following scenario to me.
Table 1
|
|
Characteristic
Price
Fast check-in
Express checkout
Location
Comfortable bed
Continental breakfast
Jacuzzi
Internet hook-up
Newspaper
Cable/HBO
Exercise room
Swimming pool
Restaurant |
Business Client
Performance
Performance
Must Be
Performance
Must Be
Must Be
Delighter
Must Be
Must Be
Delighter
Delighter
Delighter
Performance |
The first thing he did was to identify a list of qualities the
client would be interested in. He came upon his list by listening to
complaints, handing out surveys, holding focus groups and conducting
interviews. The information in the extreme left column is a partial
list from the voice of the customer. Knowing that I
was involved in something that dealt with customer satisfaction, he
asked me to assist him in ranking the characteristics.
I explained the concepts behind the Kano Model, and together we
developed the list in the column labeled Business Client.
This was all fine and dandy, as far as the business customer was
concerned. |
| |
|
For
my own interest, I asked him to look at these same characteristics from the
point of view of a vacationing family, with perhaps a few children. As a
final task, I asked him to assess how strong or weak he felt the hotel was
when trying to meet those quality characteristics identified in table 1.
Table 2
|
|
Characteristic
Price
Fast check-in
Express checkout
Location
Comfortable bed
Continental breakfast
Jacuzzi
Internet hook-up
Newspaper
Cable/HBO
Exercise room
Swimming pool
Restaurant |
Business Client
Performance
Performance
Must Be
Performance
Must Be
Must Be
Delighter
Must Be
Must Be
Delighter
Delighter
Delighter
Performance |
Vacationer
Must Be
Performance
Performance
Performance
Must Be
Delighter
Performance
Delighter
Delighter
Must Be
Performance
Must Be
Performance |
How Good Are We?
Satisfactory
Weak
Weak
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Weak
Weak
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Weak
Satisfactory
Weak |
|
The
conclusions from this effort can be as summarized by looking at the
rows that have a characteristic in the Must Be category. With respect
to the business client, this yielded express checkout, a comfortable bed,
continental breakfast, internet hook-up and newspaper. The vacationer, on
the hand, had must be's that include price, comfortable bed,
cable/ HBO, and a swimming pool.
Of these characteristics, the
manager realized that the hotel was weak in the check-in and express
checkout process, and internet hook-up. This exercise allowed the manager to
better address the needs of the customer, based on their critical to
quality characteristics. Now the work begins to minimize the gap of
where the hotel is with respect to where the hotel wants to be.
One final word. If a characteristic isn't on
the list, does that mean it can be ignored?
|
|